Apple is far more controlling than Adobe has ever been. Apple also tries to limit development of its software to happen only on OS X.
#ADOBE ILLUSTRATOR CS5 SOFTWARE BOOK WINDOWS#
When exactly is Apple going to make iTunes for something other than Windows or OS X? Oh thats right, NEVER.
#ADOBE ILLUSTRATOR CS5 SOFTWARE BOOK INSTALL#
I think it would be great if content providers like Hulu streamed naked video but there isn’t a good business case for them to do so, especially when Flash has a much higher install base.Īdobe has put out flash for many different platforms and I have had relatively few problems with it. No market loss so what is to be gained by switching at this point? What Hulu did instead was create a streaming app for idevices. The HTML5 crowd incorrectly predicted that sites would like Hulu would switch over to HTML5 because of the iphone.
So you are still on the “Flash is DOOMED” bandwagon even though Google has said that Flash isn’t going anywhere? Why should Hulu switch to HTML5 from Flash? You have to provide benefits over Flash, you can’t just offer a subset of features.īut it probably means alot more of this type of misunderstanding is on the way. Maybe there will be in the future but that would still not be enough for major content producers to warrant a switch. Not the same and there is currently no easy way to do it. You’re talking about webpage layers which could then be parsed out with a plug-in. It already has the *capability* to do that. Html 5 ( the technology) does *not* need to “provide for layered advertisement on top of a video”.
That doesn’t mean it is difficult, that just means it is proprietary. Try adding a layered ad on top of a video with out any special purposed adobe labelled software. The flash bytecode is much more difficult to work with than html 5. Tools are also technology and there is currently no tool that provides similar functionality.
No I’m not, HTML5 video will not use a format that allows overlay advertising. Oh, you are confusing the technology with the tools. I know I won’t be the only one to be happy to completely say goodbye to Flash someday. That isn’t the only galaxy review that states this about Flash on the device. So when HTML 5 catches up, will most people care about flash on their phones?Įven a powerful tablet like the new Samsung Galaxy functions poorly when Flash is on, and much better with it off, which shows that this has nothing to do with Apple, but rather Adobe, and the technology in general. Do we doubt that 6 months from now HTML 5 will pretty much have caught up with Flash? Flash has been at about 75% for ages, and it’s not going to get higher. 54% of all video is now on HTML 5, as opposed to 16% just 6 months ago. Flash Ads, well, I think we all feel the same way about that! I’d rather not have my phone burdened with them.īut for video, HTML 5 is catching up. Flash enabled sites are far less useful on phones, and even tablets. It seems to me that the major function of flash on small mobile devices is to present video. Adobe wants to get the software on all products. 4 years later, and it’s just on a small handful of phones, and still doesn’t work as well as it should.Īpple is interested in protecting what they see is the performance of their products. Adobe said, confidently, that they would have it in a few months. Jobs gave Adobe notice before the iPhone went on sale almost 4 years ago now, that Flash would only appear on the phone when it worked properly. And we might notice that only they can write the tools or a Flash plug-in or player. We see these same kinds of conflicts in the open source community.Īdobe is trying to sell tools to write Flash Ads, pages, deliver video etc. And if we should say that open source is different, it’s not. Should we expect anything else? I don’t think so. Obviously, both companies are looking to what is better for themselves. The big difference between Apple and Adobe is that Apple has an OS, hardware sales, and media sales as well, while Adobe only has its software.
0 kommentar(er)
